{"id":"recoverable-detail","title":"Compression without losing future relevance","regions":["shared-inquiry","representation"],"question":"How can a representation stay navigable while retaining access to details whose importance is not yet known?","formulation":"A detail minor within one local context can matter across the whole research space. Reduction into isolated condensed accounts risks losing that future connection.","representations":[{"name":"Compact problem capsule","affords":"Fast orientation.","loses":"Unanticipated distinctions and historical context.","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction"},{"name":"Reversible evidence pointers","affords":"Return from a derived claim to its supporting material.","loses":"Pointers require maintained access and cannot themselves convey all context.","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction"}],"tension":"Local relevance judgments are necessary for navigation but unreliable as permanent deletion rules.","challenge":"Can a future question recover a detail that the initial curator did not select?","development":"active","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction","evidence":["basis-recoverable-detail"],"next_move":{"text":"Keep immutable local evidence locators; test retrieval with questions deliberately outside the initial selection.","epistemic_kind":"model_proposed"},"open_questions":["How can a representation stay navigable while retaining access to details whose importance is not yet known?","Can a future question recover a detail that the initial curator did not select?"],"formal_status":"open_problem","version":1,"content_hash":"46dd0c4e34086c05afd37fb793a1175848831218ba30ce215bc8221de6b7a6a9"}