{"id":"resumable-inquiry","title":"What lets another reader resume an inquiry?","regions":["shared-inquiry","representation"],"question":"Can a compact representation preserve enough structure for another reader or system to resume an inquiry?","formulation":"Compress an inquiry into a transferable representation, but retain the distinctions needed to recover context and challenge its interpretation.","representations":[{"name":"A compact continuation capsule","affords":"Makes transfer inexpensive.","loses":"Can omit the unresolved distinctions another reader needs.","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction"},{"name":"A capsule with alternatives and return links","affords":"Allows expansion and challenge.","loses":"Does not guarantee the same internal state in another reader or model.","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction"}],"tension":"Practical continuity of inquiry is more tractable than claiming identical mental or vector states.","challenge":"Can a new reader identify the same unresolved issue and meaningful next alternatives?","development":"historical_branch","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction","evidence":["basis-resumable-inquiry"],"next_move":{"text":"Evaluate resumability through withheld questions, disagreement preservation, and recovery of an omitted assumption.","epistemic_kind":"model_proposed"},"open_questions":["Can a compact representation preserve enough structure for another reader or system to resume an inquiry?","Can a new reader identify the same unresolved issue and meaningful next alternatives?"],"formal_status":"open_problem","version":1,"content_hash":"35b1a8e836d9905ee9afbe51d4ce59671a045fe8bd352492e6c350c6cfc7e3b8"}