{"id":"where-trust-attaches","title":"Where should trust attach?","regions":["shared-inquiry","collective-structure"],"question":"Should trust influence the author, the proposition, the contribution, or the route through the research space?","formulation":"An initial identity-linked trust proposal is revised toward attaching trust to an idea, with voting potentially changing navigable paths. The alternatives remain significant because they reward different things.","representations":[{"name":"Author-level trust","affords":"A portable prior across contributions.","loses":"Can obscure differences among the author’s claims.","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction"},{"name":"Idea-level assessment","affords":"Targets an inspectable formulation.","loses":"Versions and contexts can be conflated.","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction"},{"name":"Route selection influenced by assessments","affords":"Directs scarce attention.","loses":"Popularity may shape what becomes visible enough to be judged.","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction"}],"tension":"Changing where a score attaches changes the research ecology, not merely its presentation.","challenge":"How should a critical revision inherit, reject, or suspend the assessments attached to its predecessor?","development":"active","epistemic_kind":"reconstruction","evidence":["basis-where-trust-attaches"],"next_move":{"text":"Compare navigation under author, formulation, and version-level assessments using an explicitly hypothetical dataset.","epistemic_kind":"model_proposed"},"open_questions":["Should trust influence the author, the proposition, the contribution, or the route through the research space?","How should a critical revision inherit, reject, or suspend the assessments attached to its predecessor?"],"formal_status":"open_problem","version":1,"content_hash":"88f2dea9d7cfb4d6655b8af0048fa15ec833078362a8f55959a3a8cd864182e7"}